From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: is per patch checkpatch reports working? Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 12:43:13 +0200 Message-ID: <2975014.4ik6Sx9Qhf@xps> References: <41b40e2e-3b15-f7b3-78df-660610fe0486@intel.com> <1925609.vO2Ab2XL5m@xps> <20181019103829.GA1349@sivswdev01.ir.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: Ferruh Yigit , Qian Xu , dpdk-dev , dpdk-test-report To: "Liang, Ma" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181019103829.GA1349@sivswdev01.ir.intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" You should open a dedicated thread on the mailing with Cc the author of this script. 19/10/2018 12:38, Liang, Ma: > Hi Thomas, > I still see the issue with the awk script inside check-symbol-changes.sh. > that script still put '+' as the Section name. > any suggestion ? > I use fedora 24 and gawk > Regards > Liang > > On 19 Oct 11:27, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 19/10/2018 09:42, Ferruh Yigit: > > > I am not getting them for a while but not sure if it is only me. > > > > Thanks, I did not notice it stopped working. > > > > I have just restarted it. > > > > For info, I had to install gawk because mawk was failing with > > the new check in checkpatches.sh. > > > > >