From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shreyansh Jain Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] eal: fix libabi macro for device generalization patches Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:37:22 +0530 Message-ID: <29852135-1e96-c0a6-ea19-a4adac3a9565@nxp.com> References: <1477485486-20433-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> <8ed305c5-92aa-a169-533e-47057ea3e6fd@nxp.com> <275ffc52-acb0-c177-da32-fb8c3fee497a@intel.com> <2105472.0JeDs3sFAP@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ferruh Yigit To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cys01nam02on0070.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.37.70]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3384758C5 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:05:57 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <2105472.0JeDs3sFAP@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wednesday 26 October 2016 08:53 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-10-26 15:25, Ferruh Yigit: >> eal version seems already increased for this release, 2 => 3, in: >> d7e61ad3ae36 ("log: remove deprecated history dump") > > Yes thanks. > >> So NO need to increase it again, sorry for late notice, I just >> recognized it. >> Only librte_ether and librte_cryptodev requires the increase. > > Please could you also explain in the commit message that: > - EAL was already bumped > - what is the breakage in ethdev > - what is the breakage in cryptodev Indeed. Will do in v3 > > Thanks > - Shreyansh