From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: missing __rte_deprecated on rte_eth_stats.imcasts ? Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 01:20:48 +0100 Message-ID: <2992545.C0cUSYYlcR@xps13> References: <20151122235342.GA28210@mhcomputing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Matthew Hall Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF598D38 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 01:22:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so84898115wmw.0 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 16:22:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151122235342.GA28210@mhcomputing.net> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-11-22 18:53, Matthew Hall: > I was reading through the deprecations in rte_eth_stats to see if I could fix > the pktgen. Of course many fields were marked with __rte_deprecated . > > However I found this one field which said deprecated in its comment, but it > lacked __rte_deprecated . When setting the __rte_deprecated attribute, Stephen wanted to keep imcasts: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/8732/ > Is the comment wrong, or is the field definition wrong, or did I miss > something? We have to decide if we really want to deprecate it. I think we should set the deprecated attribute and it seems agreed. > uint64_t imcasts; > /**< Deprecated; Total number of multicast received packets. */