From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] checkpatch: don't complain about SPDX tag
	format
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:06:32 +0200
Message-ID: <2994859.WyYqfpDCHC@xps>
References: <20180417214919.8246-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C68A69
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:06:35 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20180417214919.8246-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

17/04/2018 23:49, Stephen Hemminger:
> IMHO would have been better to use the kernel SPDX style and
> keep the check but that appears to be a minority opinion.

I think it is better to work on checkpatch itself.
When defining our SPDX style, Linux one was not definitive.
Do you think we can ask the Linux community to support our SPDX style?