From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH] config: build nfp pmd support by default Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:43:11 +0000 Message-ID: <29aed2ee-78a9-05d5-b684-01f7b62d10f9@intel.com> References: <1484308202-5198-1-git-send-email-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Alejandro Lucero , dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136E41094 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:43:13 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1484308202-5198-1-git-send-email-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 1/13/2017 11:50 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > Because using a NFP PMD requires specific BSP installed, the PMD > support was not the default option before. This was just for making > people aware of such dependency, since there is no need for such a > BSP for just compiling DPDK with NFP PMD support. Although NFP will compile fine, as far as I understand BSP dependency is still there. Thomas, What do you think, is compilation enough to be enabled by default? > > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <...>