From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] igb_uio: fail and log if kernel lock down is enabled Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 14:26:12 +0100 Message-ID: <2f41af01-acf7-8fce-26bf-52ad21eac696@intel.com> References: <20180516101851.2443-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <20180516144220.21235-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <20180517113406.GA21980@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Christian Ehrhardt , Luca Boccassi , Maxime Coquelin , Stephen Hemminger To: Neil Horman Return-path: Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3826A7272 for ; Thu, 17 May 2018 15:26:15 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20180517113406.GA21980@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 5/17/2018 12:34 PM, Neil Horman wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 03:42:20PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >> When EFI secure boot is enabled, it is possible to lock down kernel and >> prevent accessing device BARs and this makes igb_uio unusable. >> >> Lock down patches are not part of the vanilla kernel but they are >> applied and used by some distros already [1]. >> >> It is not possible to fix this issue, but intention of this patch is to >> detect and log if kernel lock down enabled and don't insert the module >> for that case. >> >> The challenge is since this feature enabled by distros, they have >> different config options and APIs for it. This patch is done based on >> Fedora and Ubuntu kernel source, may needs to add more distro specific >> support. >> > I still need to ask, what exactly is the error you're seeing with inserting the > uio module? The lockdown patch set restricts BAR address changes, but via paths > acessible from user space, igbuio should still insert and initalize just fine > (or so it would seem to me). Why not fix this by detecting the problem during > the user space library initalization, where you can do so via a standard method > that works accross distributions? I have seen you comment on other thread, this v3 was just to fix a silly mistake, lets continue discussion in other thread.