From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal/linux: use more restrictive perms in hugedir Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:51:19 +0200 Message-ID: <3033732.gf2zZdh5yM@xps13> References: <1470840774-14793-1-git-send-email-robin.jarry@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com To: Robin Jarry Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D796CB6 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:51:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id b187so35520271wme.1 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 05:51:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1470840774-14793-1-git-send-email-robin.jarry@6wind.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-08-10 16:52, Robin Jarry: > There is no need for the page files to be readable (and executable) by > other users. This can be exploited by non-privileged users to access the > working memory of a DPDK app. > > Open the files with 0600. > > Signed-off-by: Robin Jarry Applied, thanks I thought there were some comments about this. Tip of the day: August is a good month to avoid comments on your patch ;)