From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [RFC 02/14] virtio: use eth_link_read/write (and bug fix) Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 16:04:23 +0100 Message-ID: <3049472.WSApEpTIyO@xps> References: <20170714183027.16021-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <0a1a1f6d-1fef-5a9b-bf80-822aeb2123f0@solarflare.com> <20170717092836.0d8932fc@xeon-e3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger To: Stephen Hemminger , Andrew Rybchenko Return-path: Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97431D7 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 16:04:45 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20170717092836.0d8932fc@xeon-e3> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 17/07/2017 18:28, Stephen Hemminger: > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 19:14:16 +0300 > Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > > > On 07/17/2017 07:01 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 15:33:26 +0300 > > > Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > > > > > >>> + link.link_autoneg = ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED; > > >> As I understand link_autoneg is 1 bit field with boolean semantics. I.e. 0/false - no autoneg, 1/true - autoneg. > > >> It looks like it has wrong comment: > > >> uint16_t link_autoneg : 1; /**< ETH_LINK_SPEED_[AUTONEG/FIXED] */ > > >> > > >> since > > >> #define ETH_LINK_SPEED_AUTONEG (0 << 0) /**< Autonegotiate (all speeds) */ > > >> #define ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED (1 << 0) /**< Disable autoneg (fixed speed) */ > > >> > > >> whereas > > >> #define ETH_LINK_FIXED 0 /**< No autonegotiation. */ > > >> #define ETH_LINK_AUTONEG 1 /**< Autonegotiated. */ > > >> > > >> In general this attempt to introduce bug is the result of wrong comment which is caused by very similar > > >> defines with opposite values. > > > Orignal observation was because some drivers (vmxnet3) were setting autoneg = fixed > > > and others were not. Turns out it makes no difference > > > since FIXED == 0, the old code and new code have same effect. > > > > May be I miss something, but ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED==1, but > > ETH_LINK_FIXED==0. > > So, initially it was 0 (fixed speed), but now it is 1 (autoneg). > > My understanding is that ETH_SPEED_XXX and ETH_LINK_FIXED are for rte_eth_link > structure; and ETH_LINK_SPEED_XXX values are for dev_info->speed_capa Right. The comment is wrong. rte_eth_link.link_autoneg must uses ETH_LINK_[FIXED/AUTONEG] ETH_LINK_SPEED_[AUTONEG/FIXED] is for rte_eth_conf.link_speeds and for rte_eth_dev_info.speed_capa. So in this patch, you should set link.link_autoneg = ETH_LINK_FIXED. I will send a patch to fix the comment in ethdev.