From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] app test: fix mempool cache_size not match
	limited cache_size
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:26:32 +0200
Message-ID: <3134557.VXyn7jiyUM@xps13>
References: <1438140121-9011-1-git-send-email-yong.liu@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Yong Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com
 [209.85.212.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AA74A63
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun,  2 Aug 2015 23:27:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wicgj17 with SMTP id gj17so80495527wic.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 14:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1438140121-9011-1-git-send-email-yong.liu@intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2015-07-29 11:22, Yong Liu:
> In previous setting, mempool size and cache_size are both 32.
> This is not satisfied with cache_size checking rule by now.
> Cache size should less than CONFIG_RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE and mempool size / 1.5.

Sorry I don't really understand this explanation.

>  #define NB_MBUF          32
>  #define MBUF_DATA_SZ     (2048 + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM)
> -#define PKT_BURST_SZ     32
> +#define PKT_BURST_SZ     0
>  #define MEMPOOL_CACHE_SZ PKT_BURST_SZ

Shouldn't be MEMPOOL_CACHE_SZ to set to 0?