From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] rte_ring: remove deprecated functions
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:15:10 +0200
Message-ID: <3193080.9j8deXXLB3@xps13>
References: <1434086314-14371-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <557A724F.5090801@redhat.com> <20150612140023.GA6688@bricha3-MOBL3>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger <shemming@brocade.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com
 [209.85.212.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C73C2FC
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:16:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wiga1 with SMTP id a1so18944689wig.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 07:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150612140023.GA6688@bricha3-MOBL3>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2015-06-12 15:00, Bruce Richardson:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 08:46:55AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On 06/12/2015 08:18 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Also, patch title should be prefixed with "ring pmd" or "drivers/net/ring" rather
> than rte_ring, since this is a patch for the ring pmd, not the rte_ring library.

Previously, there was no difference, it was only "ring".
Prefixes don't include full path nor "pmd".
Is it really important to make a difference in the commit title between ring lib
and ring pmd?