Re: [v2 20/23] librte_cfgfile: interpret config files

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

2014-10-17 18:16, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> Hi Tomas,
> 
> Yes, you're right, we need to close on this pending item.
> Thanks for bringing it up.
> 
> I am currently working on a patch series, once I send it out
> I will come back and look into to qos_sched. Is this OK with you?

Yes, thank you.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 5:46 PM
> To: Dumitrescu, Cristian
> Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org; Wu, Jingjing; Liu, Jijiang
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [v2 20/23] librte_cfgfile: interpret config files
> 
> Hi Cristian,
> 
> 2014-06-04 19:08, Cristian Dumitrescu:
> > This library provides a tool to interpret config files that have standard
> > structure.
> > 
> > It is used by the Packet Framework examples/ip_pipeline sample application.
> > 
> > It originates from examples/qos_sched sample application and now it makes
> > this code available as a library for other sample applications to use.
> > The code duplication with qos_sched sample app to be addressed later.
> 
> 4 months ago, you said that this duplication will be adressed later.
> Neither you nor anyone at Intel submitted a patch to clean up that.
> I just want to be sure that "later" doesn't mean "never" because
> I'm accepting another "later" word for cleaning old filtering API.
> 
> Maybe you just forgot it so please prove me that I'm right to accept
> "later" clean-up, in general.
> 
> Thanks