From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API refactoring Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 09:08:28 +0100 Message-ID: <3243448.uE5B0znWZS@xps13> References: <1457992546-32230-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: "Zhang, Helin" , "Xu, Qian Q" , "Xing, Beilei" , dev@dpdk.org, "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "Lu, Wenzhuo" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "Glynn, Michael J" To: Marc Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5087D3772 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 09:10:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id l68so46346468wml.0 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 01:10:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Marc, Thanks for finding time to help. 2016-03-25 22:30, Marc: > From v9 to v10 patchset the values ETH_LINK_SPEED_AUTONEG and ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED were flipped. Reverting this makes it work: > > marc@Beluga:~/personal/dpdk/tools$ git diff > diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h > index ef2502a..fb247a7 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h > +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h > @@ -244,8 +244,8 @@ struct rte_eth_stats { > /** > * Device supported speeds bitmap flags > */ > -#define ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED (0 << 0) /**< Disable autoneg (fixed speed) */ > -#define ETH_LINK_SPEED_AUTONEG (1 << 0) /**< Autonegotiate (all speeds) */ > +#define ETH_LINK_SPEED_AUTONEG (0 << 0) /**< Autonegotiate (all speeds) */ > +#define ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED (1 << 0) /**< Disable autoneg (fixed speed) */ > #define ETH_LINK_SPEED_10M_HD (1 << 1) /**< 10 Mbps half-duplex */ > #define ETH_LINK_SPEED_10M (1 << 2) /**< 10 Mbps full-duplex */ > #define ETH_LINK_SPEED_100M_HD (1 << 3) /**< 100 Mbps half-duplex */ > > I think having autoneg == 0 is better. Do you agree Thomas? No I do not agree, because this flag is now used also for rte_eth_link.link_autoneg. So it is more logic to set it to 1. Would it be possible to fix without reverting?