From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] test: reduce test duration for efd autotest Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:25:27 +0100 Message-ID: <3322984.ekidMcbYZi@xps> References: <1540996216-28812-1-git-send-email-jananeex.m.parthasarathy@intel.com> <1543476964-20344-1-git-send-email-jananeex.m.parthasarathy@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: Jananee Parthasarathy , byron.marohn@intel.com, pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com, reshma.pattan@intel.com To: dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309FF324D for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:25:31 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1543476964-20344-1-git-send-email-jananeex.m.parthasarathy@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Any review please? 29/11/2018 08:36, Jananee Parthasarathy: > Reduced test time for efd_autotest. > Key length is updated, invoke times of random function is reduced. > Different value is updated for each hash key entry. > > Signed-off-by: Jananee Parthasarathy > --- > v3: reverted the simple_key to uint8_t type > v2: value updated for each hash key > --- > test/test/test_efd.c | 18 ++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/test/test/test_efd.c b/test/test/test_efd.c > index ced091aab..94b490fdc 100644 > --- a/test/test/test_efd.c > +++ b/test/test/test_efd.c > @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ > > #include "test.h" > > -#define EFD_TEST_KEY_LEN 8 > #define TABLE_SIZE (1 << 21) > #define ITERATIONS 3 > > @@ -331,8 +330,9 @@ static int test_average_table_utilization(void) > { > struct rte_efd_table *handle = NULL; > uint32_t num_rules_in = TABLE_SIZE; > - uint8_t simple_key[EFD_TEST_KEY_LEN]; > - unsigned int i, j; > + uint8_t simple_key; > + unsigned int j; > + efd_value_t val; > unsigned int added_keys, average_keys_added = 0; > > printf("Evaluating table utilization and correctness, please wait\n"); > @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static int test_average_table_utilization(void) > > for (j = 0; j < ITERATIONS; j++) { > handle = rte_efd_create("test_efd", num_rules_in, > - EFD_TEST_KEY_LEN, efd_get_all_sockets_bitmask(), > + sizeof(uint8_t), efd_get_all_sockets_bitmask(), > test_socket_id); > if (handle == NULL) { > printf("efd table creation failed\n"); > @@ -353,15 +353,13 @@ static int test_average_table_utilization(void) > /* Add random entries until key cannot be added */ > for (added_keys = 0; added_keys < num_rules_in; added_keys++) { > > - for (i = 0; i < EFD_TEST_KEY_LEN; i++) > - simple_key[i] = rte_rand() & 0xFF; > + simple_key = rte_rand() & 0xFF; > + val = mrand48() & VALUE_BITMASK; > > - efd_value_t val = simple_key[0]; > - > - if (rte_efd_update(handle, test_socket_id, simple_key, > + if (rte_efd_update(handle, test_socket_id, &simple_key, > val)) > break; /* continue;*/ > - if (rte_efd_lookup(handle, test_socket_id, simple_key) > + if (rte_efd_lookup(handle, test_socket_id, &simple_key) > != val) > lost_keys++; > else >