From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: ignore bit macro in checkpatch Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 16:26:47 +0200 Message-ID: <33283186.tgNgKiA73h@xps13> References: <1461071789-14171-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit To: dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2986C568A for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 16:26:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id n129so133357130wmn.1 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:26:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d5sm3520806wje.20.2016.05.24.07.26.48 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 24 May 2016 07:26:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1461071789-14171-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-04-19 15:16, Thomas Monjalon: > It was suggesting to use a Linux macro: > CHECK:BIT_MACRO: Prefer using the BIT macro > > It is ignored because it is a false positive in DPDK case. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon Applied By the way, maybe that someone would like to implement RTE_BIT?