From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: DPDK patch backlog Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:45:23 +0200 Message-ID: <3345500.oDnpnKKuHc@xps13> References: <20151015144406.1aaca698@xeon-e3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-f43.google.com (mail-lf0-f43.google.com [209.85.215.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148EF568E for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:46:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: by lffv3 with SMTP id v3so76633641lff.0 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:46:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20151015144406.1aaca698@xeon-e3> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-10-15 14:44, Stephen Hemminger: > There are currently 428 patches in New state in DPDK patchwork. > > Thomas, could you start reducing that backlog? Yes > The simplest solution would be to merge some of the big patch series > from Intel for the base drivers, then reviewers can focus on the other > patches. That's why having a drivers/net subtree would be useful.