From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] config: disable RTE_NEXT_ABI by default Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 17:55:34 +0200 Message-ID: <33456122.koQSlajCb5@xps> References: <20181004154306.65867-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <1785611.eL8Z1dKoq2@xps> <56a42359-9ead-7c33-72a3-1d89d56f383c@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Neil Horman , Luca Boccassi , Christian Ehrhardt To: Ferruh Yigit Return-path: Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36EA1B556 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 17:55:39 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <56a42359-9ead-7c33-72a3-1d89d56f383c@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 04/10/2018 17:28, Ferruh Yigit: > On 10/4/2018 4:10 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 04/10/2018 17:48, Ferruh Yigit: > >> Enabling RTE_NEXT_ABI means to enable APIs that break the ABI for > >> the current release and these APIs are targeted for further release. > > > > It seems nobody is using it in last releases. > > > >> RTE_NEXT_ABI shouldn't be enabled by default. > > > > The reason for having it enabled by default is that when you build DPDK > > yourself, you probably want the latest features. > > If packaged properly for stability, it is easy to disable it in > > the package recipe. > > My concern was (if this has been used), user may get unstable APIs and without > explicitly being aware of it. I am OK with both defaults (enabled or disabled).