From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] mbuf: fix for incomplete nb_segs types change Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 06:09:35 +0100 Message-ID: <3421519.PnyVhdA6Oj@xps> References: <04EF52DF-6CE8-4EF4-96AA-711184F8379F@gmail.com> <2FAC1B54-ACCA-439E-BE58-10007DB35E56@gmail.com> <20171113103328.bcxyswa3toxemht5@platinum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Olivier MATZ , Ilya Matveychikov Return-path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3603E1B1A4 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 08:46:09 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20171113103328.bcxyswa3toxemht5@platinum> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > > >> Update types of variables to correspond to nb_segs type change from > > >> uint8_t to uint16_t. > > >> > > >> Fixes: 97cb466d65c9 ("mbuf: use 2 bytes for port and nb segments") > > >> Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Ilya V. Matveychikov > Acked-by: Olivier Matz Is there a real benefit to get it in 17.11? Is there a risk?