From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: Patches outstanding Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:46:30 +0100 Message-ID: <3427184.DR4H9RgUjS@xps13> References: <20150217103507.7da72f1a@uryu.home.lan> <20150219130829.GE24069@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org, Stephen Hemminger To: Neil Horman Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150219130829.GE24069-B26myB8xz7F8NnZeBjwnZQMhkBWG/bsMQH7oEaQurus@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" 2015-02-19 08:08, Neil Horman: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:35:07AM -0500, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > There are currently 1039 patches outstanding on DPDK. > > What is the schedule for getting these merged or resolved? > > I don't think it would be reasonable to declare 2.0 as done > > until the patch backlog is 0! > > > > I think the subtrees were supposed to start biting into this, but I don't see > them getting used yet. Yes Actually the main problem is still on reviews. There are more good reviews in this cycle. But some patchset are not reviewed and some others are acked without being carefully reviewed.