From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] eal: add new rte color definition
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:38:10 +0100
Message-ID: <34337288.XBznk5NxM7@xps>
References: <20181123165423.134922-1-jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
 <1646379.j0tofnCs90@xps>
 <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891268E81658C@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: "Pattan, Reshma" <reshma.pattan@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
 "jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com" <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>, "Singh,
 Jasvinder" <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>,
 "david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
 olivier.matz@6wind.com
To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2AF61B58D
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:38:15 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891268E81658C@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

18/12/2018 12:18, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> > > I replied in v3 that it should stay in rte_meter.h.
> > > You can include rte_meter.h in ethdev.
> > 
> > OK, thanks Thomas, makes sense to me as well.
> > 
> 
> Thomas,
> 
> I agree with your input, but just want to make sure we are on the same page:
> 
> Besides including rte_meter.h in ethdev (which you are fine with), we would also need to include rte_meter.h in mbuf.
> 
> Are you OK with this as well?

Why do we need rte_meter.h in mbuf?