From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: libhugetlbfs Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:40:10 +0200 Message-ID: <3797202.NyZr8XgqE1@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (mail-wi0-f171.google.com [209.85.212.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D875947 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:41:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wicgb10 with SMTP id gb10so91981070wic.1 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:41:23 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Sergio, As the maintainer of memory allocation, would you consider using libhugetlbfs in DPDK for Linux? It may simplify a part of our memory allocator and avoid some potential bugs which would be already fixed in the dedicated lib.