From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ci: Add the class_id support in pci probe
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 11:29:33 +0200
Message-ID: <3830854.ocOkRYbjrN@xps13>
References: <1463660700-42992-1-git-send-email-ziye.yang@intel.com>
 <1463663877-52722-1-git-send-email-ziye.yang@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10B05699
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 11:29:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n129so119415959wmn.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 02:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1463663877-52722-1-git-send-email-ziye.yang@intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi Ziye,

Please check the title.
It could be "pci: add class id".

Please try to add a changelog below the 3 dashes when making a new revision.

Other comments below:

2016-05-19 21:17, Ziye Yang:
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h
> @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ struct rte_pci_resource {
>   * table of these IDs for each device that it supports.
>   */
>  struct rte_pci_id {
> +	uint32_t class_id;            /**< Class ID (class, subclass, pi) or RTE_CLASS_ANY_ID. */
>  	uint16_t vendor_id;           /**< Vendor ID or PCI_ANY_ID. */
>  	uint16_t device_id;           /**< Device ID or PCI_ANY_ID. */
>  	uint16_t subsystem_vendor_id; /**< Subsystem vendor ID or PCI_ANY_ID. */

You moved class_id at the beginning (which looks good)...

> @@ -177,14 +179,16 @@ struct rte_pci_device {
>  	(vend),                   \
>  	(dev),                    \
>  	PCI_ANY_ID,               \
> -	PCI_ANY_ID
> +	PCI_ANY_ID,               \
> +	RTE_CLASS_ANY_ID
>  #else
>  /** Macro used to help building up tables of device IDs */
>  #define RTE_PCI_DEVICE(vend, dev)          \
>  	.vendor_id = (vend),               \
>  	.device_id = (dev),                \
>  	.subsystem_vendor_id = PCI_ANY_ID, \
> -	.subsystem_device_id = PCI_ANY_ID
> +	.subsystem_device_id = PCI_ANY_ID, \
> +	.class_id = RTE_CLASS_ANY_ID
>  #endif

... but forgot to move these lines.