From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: Project Governance and Linux Foundation Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3947933.oyJplKdvEH@xps13> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org To: qin.chunhua@zte.com.cn Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CD8106A for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:43:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id c78so1979022wme.1 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:43:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, This is a really interesting use case. Questions below, 2016-10-12 13:44, qin.chunhua@zte.com.cn: > ZTE is supportive of improving the DPDK project governance including > moving the project to the Linux Foundation. > DPDK has been used in lots of ZTE's equipments and solutions such as > BBU,RNC,EPC,vEPC,vBRAS,vCPE,vRouter,vSwitch,and so on for many years. > We have also done some optimization in DPDK. You mean you made some optimizations to DPDK but keep them secret? > If the DPDK project governance moves to the Linux Foundation, > we think this will promote ZTE and other companies to contribute in DPDK. Why it would help you to contribute? Why not contribute today? The project is truly open, a lot of major companies are contributing, why not yours?