From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some
	errors
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 21:05:21 +0100
Message-ID: <3960464.KpnL1qVCkN@xps13>
References: <CAATJJ0KMa=+KW3FoguNKBx8=ZfjiNYKbm0gPSTa0qW0vnJ79Fw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJSM8J3QgywrVNZ8avtwWGa_i_JAjViLksgE477=pGoaDhz2Qw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJSM8J0ax6ZQRKWJr8vaFZGWnB_FvQLHm3YMCxKnGmpC=qeOtw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Martinx - =?utf-8?B?44K444Kn44O844Og44K6?= <thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887825921
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  9 Dec 2015 21:06:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id v187so1691678wmv.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:06:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJSM8J0ax6ZQRKWJr8vaFZGWnB_FvQLHm3YMCxKnGmpC=qeOtw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2015-12-09 15:54, Martinx - =E3=82=B8=E3=82=A7=E3=83=BC=E3=83=A0=E3=82=BA=
:
>  Sorry to insist on this subject but, the time for releasing DPDK 2.2=

> is near and DPDK build with Xen 32-bit is broken.
>=20
>  If DPDK doesn't fix this, there will be no way to enable XenVirt
> support for next Ubuntu LTS 16.04, which is a shame...
>=20
>  I'm planning to use DPDK on Xen domUs (PVM, HVM, XenServer and on
> Amazon EC2) powered exclusively by a supported version of Ubuntu but,=

> it is broken now...
>=20
>  So, please, can someone take a look into this?    :-P
>=20
>  Thanks in advance!

Sorry, this area has no maintainer:
=09http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/MAINTAINERS#n169

In such case, it may be logic to remove the dead code.
If someone wants to make it alive, he's welcome!