From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: DPDK patchwork upgrade Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:10:39 +0200 Message-ID: <3989145.seKIcVLuET@xps13> References: <1736050.3Z5tnqk6B6@xps13> <9398822.xtO6cvAGR1@xps13> <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E602DDBC0@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , Stephen Finucane , dev@dpdk.org To: "Liu, Yong" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A24C58D8 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:10:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id w84so237527516wmg.1 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 01:10:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E602DDBC0@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-09-22 06:34, Liu, Yong: > Thomas, > There's another new column "S/W/F" added in latest patchwork. This column is represent for validation status "success/warning/failure". > At last the status will be stored into patchwork_check database and used for continuous integration. > Below is just one sample for check infor. Do you have any plan to implement it in dpdk validation process? Yes, that's the plan: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-September/046282.html http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-July/022132.html