From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethdev: revert use device name from device structure Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 23:44:07 +0100 Message-ID: <3c49bbb7-6ecb-1bea-f529-f1edfd7ca880@intel.com> References: <20170922113007.43385-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <20170922145722.GA3871@6wind.com> <5659846.3hnuzHVyBs@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Adrien Mazarguil , ktraynor@redhat.com, gaetan.rivet@6wind.com, jblunck@infradead.org To: Thomas Monjalon , ciara.loftus@intel.com Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5B41B1C3 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:44:08 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <5659846.3hnuzHVyBs@xps> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/11/2017 10:56 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 22/09/2017 16:57, Adrien Mazarguil: >> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 12:30:07PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >>> This reverts commit a1e7c17555e8f77d520ba5f06ed26c00e77a2bd1. >>> >>> Original commit assumes there is 1:1 mapping between physical device and >>> ethdev port, so that device name can be used per port instead of ethdev >>> name field. >>> >>> But one physical device may have multiple ethdev ports and each port >>> needs its own unique name. >>> >>> One issue reported here: >>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/2017-September/002484.html >>> >>> So reverting back the commit to continue using ethdev name field per >>> port. >>> >>> Reported-by: Adrien Mazarguil >>> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit >> >> Acked-by: Adrien Mazarguil > > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.