From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB50DFF8868 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 15:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFB040611; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 17:53:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fout-b4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-b4-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.147]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57325402EA; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 17:53:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from phl-compute-07.internal (phl-compute-07.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CE31D001BA; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 11:53:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-03 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-07.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 27 Apr 2026 11:53:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1777305196; x=1777391596; bh=LGnUr6iIdQvzFIxi35alGaHIkbTxjpPfHchygpolIBU=; b= cmNWB+1URN+nQe/mS5UqIPBpxIhhoaHOPGurjQsbNwAsdYnS4JmPfUoDX4Jjvg+l CFBI42cUDqVhFLgGP71zUzLAl2P1ZS7vTROanxXZ823Aay1vn9uvjHVQlGxv4eYk b76PAJg3aCor4ykIzdSwZRV7DDCH7WqBbTDG63ITkxxzQDEWftikEHdzaRWY6QEY O7qml21xny6msWKo13AUDRFPXC0vwnYPgkvpHWqsyLveWVnj+w3F/3NK87xkzZV7 ysUqSFxRakx29PfJZUcvX7EJQgqmGWx8jiE1J2QfD0hFN1vMt70I+czJcWyyZYwT r4AzVsEITrMt2T+Cxswsyg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1777305196; x= 1777391596; bh=LGnUr6iIdQvzFIxi35alGaHIkbTxjpPfHchygpolIBU=; b=e 4D3/xifpMrDOKx2CNj+te1A8ef1ff21rUNB/ZlsYlhZmTEOXGGuuZrX6GGvR7Id9 Wk+mbwqSATKwMVECn+thyPFyq5a8uvL2hKANk9f/TH4qGywkSgeA9PGSYMEjL0hT vW8SYcRDFQiWrVQZro1d4/iPRo2bTcWR00KPt0g9ebzS5NCK9CouCSNqme+05Tw2 aZO63jg8/UwJpscw0fGRPPBTqEB4vbolcZQGS+J07iDQEWgW66z/dsbK0/GUFzfb hG+DtEYxFq2/vCKf+xhH6tFLJC0VflsTNzYlNv0aSDXOhGy6IAd2wh9omYtVHCme RozcEHKNMyMdYtVEWrbPw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefhedrtddtgdejledutdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcu ofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrf grthhtvghrnhepjeduveehieevuddutdevfffgtdegkeeuveejffejgedtgeegkefgvdeu gfefkeejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomh epthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepjedpmhho uggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepuggrvhhiugdrmhgrrhgthhgrnhgusehrvg guhhgrthdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehrjhgrrhhrhiesrhgvughhrghtrdgtohhmpdhr tghpthhtohepuggvvhesughpughkrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepghgvthgvlhhsohhnse hnvhhiughirgdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehsthgrsghlvgesughpughkrdhorhhgpdhr tghpthhtohepkhhtrhgrhihnohhrsehrvgguhhgrthdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegslh hutggrseguvggsihgrnhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 11:53:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand , Robin Jarry Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Gregory Etelson , stable@dpdk.org, Kevin Traynor , Luca Boccassi Subject: Re: [PATCH dpdk v4] net: fix VLAN packet type Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 17:53:13 +0200 Message-ID: <40394769.10thIPus4b@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20260422102814.645299-2-rjarry@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 27/04/2026 12:47, Robin Jarry: > David Marchand, Apr 25, 2026 at 10:40: > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2026 at 13:25, Robin Jarry wrote: > > This is untested, but what do you think? > > That looks correct. But you don't impose a limit in the number of VLANs? > > I don't see any good reason to support more than 2 stacked tags. Look in the mailing list. I remember it was to limit a risk of infinite loop.