From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev, PATCHv6 1/6] ethdev: enhance rte_eth_(tx|rx)q_info struct Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:16:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4046983.KrILXsIe2k@xps13> References: <1443729293-20753-2-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> <1445292384-19815-2-git-send-email-amine.kherbouche@6wind.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836AB2B07@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Amine Kherbouche Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D057B5A65 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:17:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wicfv8 with SMTP id fv8so33960768wic.0 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:17:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836AB2B07@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-10-20 09:36, Ananyev, Konstantin: > As I can see your patch series should be applied on top of mine: > [PATCHv5 0/8] ethdev: add new API to retrieve RX/TX queue information > Which is not yet in the dpdk.org mainline. > I believe that is ok, but then you shouldn't replace previous version with the patch (v5) > with new one, but create a new patch for your changes and clearly state that dependency. Yes, Amine, this is not a new version of Konstantin's patches. So you must not use v6 and you should mention in the cover letter that it depends on Konstantin's patches. Please use v2 next time.