From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] eal cleanup and new options Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:55:19 +0100 Message-ID: <4091968.6vrJ5rTTlz@xps13> References: <1416692622-28886-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1416692622-28886-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" > There are some pending patches which requires to factorize some EAL parts > in order to be correctly implemented. > This patchset do the required clean-up and rework these patches to improve > lcore handling: > > Didier Pallard (2): > eal: add core list input format > config: support 128 cores > > Patrick Lu (1): > eal: get relative core index > > Simon Kuenzer (1): > eal: add option --master-lcore > > Thomas Monjalon (6): > eal: move internal headers in source directory > eal: factorize common headers > eal: fix header guards > eal: factorize internal config reset > eal: factorize options sanity check > eal: factorize configuration adjustment Applied with last comments integrated. The conclusions to the vote about the -c/-l options are: - people don't vote (don't care or don't read) - a few votes give the majority to creating the -l option. Neil, I'm really not sure what is the best solution. Maybe that applying this patch will make more voices raising. We'll see, all can be changed. -- Thomas