From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rte_sched: release enqueued mbufs on rte_sched_port_free() Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 23:27:09 +0100 Message-ID: <4124667.VOLfeeqxbI@xps13> References: <20151117091448.5419c28f@miho> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Simon Kagstrom Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC7E8E81 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 23:28:28 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so157822178wmw.1 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:28:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151117091448.5419c28f@miho> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-11-17 09:14, Simon Kagstrom: > Otherwise mbufs will leak when the port is destroyed. The > rte_sched_port_qbase() and rte_sched_port_qsize() functions are used > in free now, so move them up. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Kagstrom Applied, thanks