From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory: do not use base-virtaddr in secondary processes Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:08:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4151001.GHUicDdu0G@xps> References: <1529351589-173939-1-git-send-email-dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com> <6fb6125a-9f0a-4c37-a51b-c266f353d5b9@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Burakov, Anatoly" , stable@dpdk.org To: Dariusz Stojaczyk Return-path: In-Reply-To: <6fb6125a-9f0a-4c37-a51b-c266f353d5b9@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 19/06/2018 11:21, Burakov, Anatoly: > On 18-Jun-18 8:53 PM, Dariusz Stojaczyk wrote: > > Since secondary process' address space is highly dictated > > by the primary process' mappings, it doesn't make much > > sense to use base-virtaddr for secondary processes. > > > > This patch is intended to fix PCI resource mapping > > in secondary processes using the same base-virtaddr > > as their primary processes. PCI uses the end of the hugepage > > memory area to map all resources. [pci_find_max_end_va()] > > It works for primary processes, but can't be mapped 1:1 > > by secondary ones, as the same addresses are currently always > > occupied by shadow memseg lists, which were created with > > eal_get_virtual_area(NULL, ...). > > > > ``` > > PRIMARY PROCESS > > 0x6e00e00000 388K rw-s- fbarray_memseg-2048k-1-3 > > 0x6e01000000 16777216K r---- [ anon ] > > 0x7201000000 16K rw-s- resource0 > > > > SECONDARY PROCESS > > 0x6e00e00000 388K rw-s- fbarray_memseg-2048k-1-3 > > 0x6e01000000 16777216K r---- [ anon ] > > 0x7201000000 4K rw-s- fbarray_memseg-1048576k-0-0_203213 > > ``` > > > > Fixes: 524e43c2ad9a ("mem: prepare memseg lists for multiprocess sync") > > Cc: anatoly.burakov@intel.com > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk > > --- > > Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov Applied, thanks