From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ethtool: dispaly firmware version Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 14:00:55 +0000 Message-ID: <416747ed-2df3-10d9-5f01-39e77c84b66b@intel.com> References: <1482841816-54143-1-git-send-email-qiming.yang@intel.com> <1483531428-14481-1-git-send-email-qiming.yang@intel.com> <1483531428-14481-6-git-send-email-qiming.yang@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: helin.zhang@intel.com, remy.horton@intel.com To: Qiming Yang , dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD882BB9 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 15:00:57 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1483531428-14481-6-git-send-email-qiming.yang@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 1/4/2017 12:03 PM, Qiming Yang wrote: > This patch enhances the ethtool example to support to show > firmware version, in the same way that the Linux kernel > ethtool does. > > Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang <...> > > @@ -61,6 +67,12 @@ rte_ethtool_get_drvinfo(uint8_t port_id, struct ethtool_drvinfo *drvinfo) > dev_info.driver_name); > snprintf(drvinfo->version, sizeof(drvinfo->version), "%s", > rte_version()); > + if (strcmp(drvinfo->driver, "net_ixgbe") == 0) Do you need this check. I think it is not good idea to add this kind of checks into ethtool app. Why not just print "%d.%d.%d %#X, major, minor, patch, etrack" for all cases ? > + snprintf(drvinfo->fw_version, sizeof(drvinfo->fw_version), > + "0x%08x", etrack); > + else > + snprintf(drvinfo->fw_version, sizeof(drvinfo->fw_version), > + "%d.%02d 0x%08x", fw_major, fw_minor, etrack); > if (dev_info.pci_dev) > snprintf(drvinfo->bus_info, sizeof(drvinfo->bus_info), > "%04x:%02x:%02x.%x", >