From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mk: remove broken check Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 13:53:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4229908.dRXGeFGLpr@xps> References: <20181009021858.19216-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20181009021858.19216-3-thomas@monjalon.net> <20181009114320.GA17331@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, gaetan.rivet@6wind.com, ophirmu@mellanox.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com, remy.horton@intel.com To: Neil Horman Return-path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937661B50F for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 13:53:49 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20181009114320.GA17331@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 09/10/2018 13:43, Neil Horman: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 04:18:56AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Next patch does not pass the experimental check > > because it has an (unrelated) experimental function in his context. > > > > Cc: Neil Horman > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > --- > > mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk b/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk > > index a734cbbd0..acb9796fa 100644 > > --- a/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk > > +++ b/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk > > @@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ C_TO_O_DO = @set -e; \ > > echo $(C_TO_O_DISP); \ > > $(C_TO_O) && \ > > $(PMDINFO_TO_O) && \ > > - $(CHECK_EXPERIMENTAL) && \ > > echo $(C_TO_O_CMD) > $(call obj2cmd,$(@)) && \ > > sed 's,'$@':,dep_'$@' =,' $(call obj2dep,$(@)).tmp > $(call obj2dep,$(@)) && \ > > rm -f $(call obj2dep,$(@)).tmp > > NACK. Yes, of course. I have added this patch in the series in order to allow building the patches. > Its a bit vague to get the meaning of your changelog, but based on the > context of the actual other patch I think what you're saying is that patch 3/4 in > this series has the __rte_experimental token in it as part of the context of a > diff, rather than as a change itself, and the check-experimental-syms script is > matching on that when it shouldn't. The correct fix is to teach the difference > between changes and context to the check-experimental-syms.sh script, not to > break the whole thing by just removing the call to the script. I agree, but I don't understand how the patch context is related to the checks done in buildtools. Please could you fix it? It is blocking the integration of this series. Thanks