From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ethdev: rename callbacks field to intr_cbs Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:06:57 +0100 Message-ID: <4241109.JKBOKelqd6@xps13> References: <1419266844-4848-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <1423841989-9090-1-git-send-email-john.mcnamara@intel.com> <1423841989-9090-2-git-send-email-john.mcnamara@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: John McNamara Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1423841989-9090-2-git-send-email-john.mcnamara-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" 2015-02-13 15:39, John McNamara: > From: Richardson, Bruce > > The callbacks member of the rte_eth_dev structure has been renamed > to intr_cbs to make it clear that it refers to callbacks from NIC > interrupts. This then allows us to add other types of callbacks to > the structure without ambiguity. Yes, good. Actually this callback is used only for link status interrupt, right? In the patchset for interrupt mode, new callbacks are used, right? Should we name this callback more precisely?