From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/8] qede: Add maintainers, documentation and license Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:40:28 +0200 Message-ID: <4341119.KJ3oJZPHXU@xps13> References: <1461647586-22234-1-git-send-email-rasesh.mody@qlogic.com> <20160426150423.GC10896@bricha3-MOBL3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Mcnamara, John" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "ameen.rahman@qlogic.com" , Harish Patil , Sony Chacko To: Rasesh Mody Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FF92617 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:40:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id e201so1382083wme.0 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 08:40:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-04-26 15:19, Mcnamara, John: > > From: Richardson, Bruce > > Ideally, the feature matrix would be updated as each patch adds new > > features, but since this is a new driver, I'm ok with just having this as > > part of that core driver patch too - with a note in the commit stating > > that the following commits contain the code for the features not > > implemented in that one. > > > > Thomas, John McNamara, as keen viewers and maintainers of our > > documentation, any comments or strong objection to this? > > Hi, > > No objection from me. That sounds reasonable. Yes sounds a reasonable requirement. Having everything split in feature's patches would be perfect, so do at your best. Thanks