From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] use macro to declare constructor functions Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 22:09:39 +0100 Message-ID: <4418011.24SpsXxQY4@xps> References: <20171102221034.6919-1-thomas@monjalon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit To: dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B441B2EE for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 22:09:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8DC177FA7E for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 16:09:40 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20171102221034.6919-1-thomas@monjalon.net> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 02/11/2017 23:10, Thomas Monjalon: > It is easier to find all constructor functions when they use > the same macros RTE_INIT or RTE_INIT_PRIO. > > The macro definitions are moved from rte_eal.h to rte_common.h. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon Applied