From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:51:33 +0100 Message-ID: <4419490.AdglZy8rsf@xps13> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Panu Matilainen Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5F48D8B for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:52:41 +0100 (CET) Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so123663666wic.1 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:52:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > > The number of memory channels is a truly obscure thing as a mandatory > > command line argument when its really just an optimization. > > Provide a reasonable default in mempool as suggested by Bruce Richardson > > and make the -n argument optional in EAL to make DPDK that little bit > > easier to use for a first-timer. > > > > Panu Matilainen (2): > > mempool: use a better default for number of memory channels > > eal: make the -n argument optional > > Acked-by: David Marchand Applied, thanks