From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: DPDK patch backlog Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 23:39:41 +0200 Message-ID: <4459436.AnjPTFCH6g@xps13> References: <20151015144406.1aaca698@xeon-e3> <2265365.ZSeGOJNMlR@xps13> <20151021174113.GA25072@mhcomputing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Matthew Hall Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFE09E5 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 23:40:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wijp11 with SMTP id p11so94756009wij.0 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:40:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20151021174113.GA25072@mhcomputing.net> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-10-21 10:41, Matthew Hall: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:03:41AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Compilation must be tested with GCC and clang, as static and shared libraries > > and for 32-bit and 64-bit targets. > > Is this process scripted somewhere? Yes, I've sent a script: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/7952/