From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] mem: allow mem size to be specified when no hugetblfs Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:54:45 +0200 Message-ID: <4523834.AgJP7xiYyx@xps13> References: <1432909438-21329-1-git-send-email-patkins@brocade.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Paul Atkins Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711CF5A53 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:55:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wibdq8 with SMTP id dq8so79251520wib.1 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 06:55:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1432909438-21329-1-git-send-email-patkins@brocade.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-05-29 15:23, Paul Atkins: > The config option to turn off huge table support does not work with > the existing -m option to specify the amount of memory to use. Add > a new option --no-huge-mem-size that takes a paramater > to use as the heap size instead of the value specified by > MEMSIZE_IF_NO_HUGE_PAGE. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Atkins Instead of adding a new option, the constraint is removed by this patch: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/4915/ That's why this patch is rejected. Hope the above patch match your needs.