From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/33] config: add Cavium OcteonTX crypto PMD skeleton Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 16:36:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4535314.c5AgpL1HhT@xps> References: <1528476325-15585-1-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com> <06b2d39f-5d9a-d1e2-f3bb-5238e40e6406@nxp.com> <23e3b8a8-32f9-cd91-bef9-c03eff0d4e46@caviumnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Akhil Goyal , Anoob Joseph , Pablo de Lara , Ankur Dwivedi , Jerin Jacob , Narayana Prasad , Murthy NSSR , Nithin Dabilpuram , Ragothaman Jayaraman , Srisivasubramanian S , Tejasree Kondoj To: "Joseph, Anoob" Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6871B069 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 16:36:17 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <23e3b8a8-32f9-cd91-bef9-c03eff0d4e46@caviumnetworks.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 17/09/2018 16:13, Joseph, Anoob: > On 17-09-2018 17:50, Akhil Goyal wrote: > > On 9/17/2018 5:12 PM, Joseph, Anoob wrote: > >> On 17-09-2018 16:07, Akhil Goyal wrote: > >>>>> I think it would be better to squash the makefile related changes in > >>>>> the 3/33 patch as the code > >>>>> is actually added in that and here the code is not getting compiled > >>>>> here. > >>>> So the changes in the following files has to be moved to patch 3/33? > >>>> drivers/crypto/Makefile > >>>> drivers/crypto/meson.build > >>>> drivers/crypto/octeontx/Makefile > >>>> drivers/crypto/octeontx/meson.build > >>>> mk/rte.app.mk > >>>> I think this patch will just have MAINTAINER edit (even that might be > >>>> required to be moved to 3/33?) & changes to config/common_base, after > >>>> that. Is that fine? > >>> In my opinion, you do not need this patch as separate one. > >>> config/common_base can also be added in the 3/33. > >> In that case 02/33 patch would become the first patch right? The same > >> problem would be there too, I guess. The macros added in that patch gets > >> used only in 03/33 patch. Is that fine? > > > > I think that would be fine. Better to have a 03/33 patch before 02/33 > > if it doesn't have dependencies. > 03/33 patch is dependent on 02/33 patch. Shall I proceed with merging > 01/33 to 03/33 and make 02/33 the first patch? You should start by introducing common code directory. Then you introduce the PMD directory with minimal code in it. Question: what means "cpt"? Why it is not an "octeontx" common directory?