From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ixgbe: support UDP tunnel add/del
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 13:37:05 +0100
Message-ID: <45400897.Vxte4xBp0F@xps13>
References: <1452496044-17524-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
 <CAG8AbRVW0E8soti_daMuhaeQNKuH_Xf4tyN=VkB3-nX9n1e_Ww@mail.gmail.com>
 <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC090902A7D323@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-pf0-f175.google.com (mail-pf0-f175.google.com
 [209.85.192.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F317B8E62
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 13:38:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pf0-f175.google.com with SMTP id e65so62657985pfe.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 04:38:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC090902A7D323@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi,

2016-01-11 08:28, Lu, Wenzhuo:
> [Wenzhuo] The udp_tunnel_add and udp_tunnel_del have already existed.=
 I just use them. Honestly I agree with you they are not accurate name.=
 Better change them to udp_tunnel_port_add and udp_tunnel_port_del. But=
 it should be a ABI change if I=E2=80=99m not wrong. I think we can ann=
ounce it this release and change them in the next release. Would you ag=
ree?  Thanks.

You can introduce the new name and keep the old one for backward compat=

while announcing its deprecation.
Thanks