From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] app/testpmd: initialize port_numa and
	ring_numa
Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 15:35:13 +0200
Message-ID: <4569052.iy7vOOdIzB@xps>
References: <1493344915-127542-1-git-send-email-yulong.pei@intel.com>
 <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F810D5A0CA@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
To: "Pei, Yulong" <yulong.pei@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3745C1C4A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  1 May 2017 15:35:16 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F810D5A0CA@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

28/04/2017 10:30, Wu, Jingjing:
> From: Pei, Yulong
> > 
> > Previous numa_support = 0 by default, it need to add --numa to testpmd
> > command line to enable numa, so port_numa and ring_numa were initialized at
> > function launch_args_parse(), now testpmd change numa_support = 1 as default,
> > so port_numa and ring_numa also need to initialize by default, otherwise port-
> > >socket_id will be probed to wrong value.
> > 
> > Fixes: 999b2ee0fe45 ("app/testpmd: enable NUMA support by default")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yulong Pei <yulong.pei@intel.com>
> 
> You forgot "fix" in title if the patch is fixing a problem.
> Anyway, the change is OK.
> Acked-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>

Please rebase on top of http://dpdk.org/commit/3ab64341d
and check if the patch needs to be reworked.
The check of port_numa array below is weird.

PS: please use --in-reply-to for v5.