From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] net/i40e: support VF request more queues Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:28:10 +0000 Message-ID: <46ec72a3-5414-ec25-263e-7edfb26d2c30@intel.com> References: <20181214143720.34163-1-zhirun.yan@intel.com> <20181217111054.45414-1-zhirun.yan@intel.com> <20181217111054.45414-2-zhirun.yan@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Haiyue Wang To: Zhirun Yan , dev@dpdk.org, qi.z.zhang@intel.com Return-path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB204C94 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:28:13 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20181217111054.45414-2-zhirun.yan@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 12/17/2018 11:10 AM, Zhirun Yan wrote: > Before this patch, VF gets a default number of queues from the PF. > This patch enables VF to request a different number. When VF configures > more queues, it will send VIRTCHNL_OP_REQUEST_QUEUES to PF to request > more queues, if success, PF will reset the VF. > > User can run "port stop all", "port config port_id rxq/txq queue_num" > and "port start all" to reconfigure queue number. Is this replaces "ETH_I40E_QUEUE_NUM_PER_VF_ARG (queue-num-per-vf)" devarg? Should we remove this devarg? > > Signed-off-by: Zhirun Yan > Signed-off-by: Haiyue Wang <...>