From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] net/af_xdp: introduce AF XDP PMD driver Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 17:27:18 +0100 Message-ID: <47075286.e8FPSn77MC@xps> References: <20190301080947.91086-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> <20190322130129.109964-2-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> <1553429435.20876.5.camel@debian.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: Xiaolong Ye , dev@dpdk.org, Qi Zhang , "Yigit, Ferruh" To: Luca Boccassi Return-path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE021B19 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 17:27:22 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1553429435.20876.5.camel@debian.org> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 24/03/2019 13:10, Luca Boccassi: > On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 21:01 +0800, Xiaolong Ye wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_pmd_af_xdp_version.map > > b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_pmd_af_xdp_version.map > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000..c6db030fe > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_pmd_af_xdp_version.map > > @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ > > +DPDK_19.05 { > > + local: *; > > +}; > > This is a new PMD, shouldn't it be EXPERIMENTAL rather than DPDK_19.05? I don't think so, because there is no API here.