From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tom.barbette@ulg.ac.be Subject: [dpdk-announce] DPDK support in the Click Modular Router Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:39:28 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <482675304.21817639.1446021568782.JavaMail.zimbra@ulg.ac.be> References: <1157129088.21791576.1446020770487.JavaMail.zimbra@ulg.ac.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: announce@dpdk.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1157129088.21791576.1446020770487.JavaMail.zimbra@ulg.ac.be> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi all, We just had DPDK support merged to the mainline Click Modular Router (https://github.com/kohler/click). Click is well-known to academics and research teams as it allows to pipe simple elements together to build a complex graph. While DPDK already provides the pipelining part, Click comes with hundred of simple elements. Moreover, Click has came back recently on the front of the stage because it lends itself as a good platform for NFV. Some time ago our team from the University of Liege published a paper (http://hdl.handle.net/2268/181954) about how to integrate modern hardware exposed by DPDK and Netmap inside userspace software like Click. We made a stripped down version (mostly removing batching) of the implementation built to support our paper which stills give unprecedentedly matched speed to Click (comparing the best speed achievable with the mainline Click which was by using Netmap : http://bit.ly/1Z2Eg4W). I hope you'll find it useful, and we'll greatly appreciate feedback regarding our thoughts in the paper or the implementation itself. Tom Barbette University of Liege