From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mk: fix ABI versioning compile error for
	combined shared library
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 08:10:25 +0100
Message-ID: <4832819.EtRlJavyLu@xps13>
References: <1706989.WgznurFLZ8@xps13> <4489406.qekDmzhmkY@xps13>
 <20151102000517.GA4669@sivlogin002.ir.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Eric Kinzie <ekinzie@brocade.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E5A5A6B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  2 Nov 2015 08:31:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wmff134 with SMTP id f134so52556697wmf.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 01 Nov 2015 23:31:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151102000517.GA4669@sivlogin002.ir.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2015-11-02 00:05, Ferruh Yigit:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:24:51AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >  ifeq ($(LINK_USING_CC),1)
> > >  # Override the definition of LD here, since we're linking with CC
> > >  LD := $(CC) $(CPU_CFLAGS)
> > > -O_TO_S = $(LD) $(call linkerprefix,$(CPU_LDFLAGS)) \
> > > +O_TO_S = $(LD) $(call linkerprefix,$(SHARED_LDFLAGS)) \
> > >  	-shared $(OBJS) -o $(RTE_OUTPUT)/lib/$(LIB_ONE)
> > >  else
> > > -O_TO_S = $(LD) $(CPU_LDFLAGS) \
> > > +O_TO_S = $(LD) $(SHARED_LDFLAGS) \
> > >  	-shared $(OBJS) -o $(RTE_OUTPUT)/lib/$(LIB_ONE)
> > >  endif
> > 
> > Why do you remove CPU_LDFLAGS?
> 
> CPU_LDFLAGS shared by other libraries and confilicts with this usage.

Sorry I don't understand.
CPU_LDFLAGS is -melf_i386 for Intel 32-bit.
Why removing it for combined library? What is the conflict?