From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] devtools: add autotest app to build script Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:03:02 +0100 Message-ID: <4e02b479-1ff0-0b20-da08-90373c8d2ca4@intel.com> References: <20170329140419.27149-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <1851186.Q5rVaVkRzi@xps13> <20170330153322.GB14552@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> <2656152.ADfflcFtbm@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org To: Thomas Monjalon , Bruce Richardson Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06E9326C for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 15:03:05 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <2656152.ADfflcFtbm@xps13> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 3/30/2017 9:42 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > For info, Ferruh did a similar patch: > http://dpdk.org/patch/22443 > Ferruh, OK to keep Bruce one? Sure, go for it, they both do same thing. > > 2017-03-30 16:33, Bruce Richardson: >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 04:36:11PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> 2017-03-29 17:38, Bruce Richardson: >>>> Since the test app is no longer being build by default as part of a build, >>>> we need to update the testbuild script to take account of this. >>> [...] >>>> --- a/devtools/test-build.sh >>>> +++ b/devtools/test-build.sh >>>> @@ -229,6 +229,9 @@ for conf in $configs ; do >>>> echo "================== Build $dir" >>>> make -j$J EXTRA_CFLAGS="$maxerr $DPDK_DEP_CFLAGS" \ >>>> EXTRA_LDFLAGS="$DPDK_DEP_LDFLAGS" $verbose O=$dir >>>> + echo "================== Build tests for $dir" >>>> + make test-build -j$J EXTRA_CFLAGS="$maxerr $DPDK_DEP_CFLAGS" \ >>>> + EXTRA_LDFLAGS="$DPDK_DEP_LDFLAGS" $verbose O=$dir >>>> ! $short || break >>>> echo "================== Build examples for $dir" >>>> export RTE_SDK=$(pwd) >>> >>> It should be added after the "short break". >>> >> You have no idea how many times in preparing the patchset I moved the >> addition above the break, and then back below it, and above it again! >> You pick what you think is best. :-) >> >>> The test-build target rebuild all. >> It rebuilds the libs, but not the apps, which is why we can't just >> use test-build target, or we will skip testpmd. >> >>> I think it should be standard apps like the examples >>> and not re-link the libs before building. >>> The other way is to merge it with the above command (default build). >> >> I tried merging the two into a single command, i.e. "make all >> test-build" but that failed with parallel builds because the two jobs >> try and build some things at the same time and interfere with each >> other. [The kernel drivers seemed to be the main problem] >> >> /Bruce > >