From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Rybchenko Subject: Re: Solarflare PMD submission question Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:05:20 +0300 Message-ID: <4e5189f0-d340-ae7c-0300-aefd64041022@solarflare.com> References: <7987614.kmGMHz0qWb@xps13> <2de43e28-37f8-86f5-b45f-2e598137b3dc@solarflare.com> <1838661.tWJoShD1UF@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com [209.65.160.86]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2372BD1 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:05:29 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1838661.tWJoShD1UF@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/28/2016 03:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-10-28 13:50, Andrew Rybchenko: >> First of all I'd like to double check that it is clear that we discuss >> libefx >> (base driver in terms of DPDK) import here. The PMD itself is already split >> in 20+ patches. > I don't know libefx. In DPDK, a base driver is often a subdirectory > inside the PMD. Will it be the case? Yes. Just to be absolutely sure: are the discussed requirements to split applicable to base driver import? Andrew.