From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: add knwon issue of PF reset event handling Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:24:19 +0100 Message-ID: <5045418.V6AhYGvCDE@xps13> References: <1450055554-1828-1-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Helin Zhang Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3714A63 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:25:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id n186so118186684wmn.1 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 05:25:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1450055554-1828-1-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-12-14 09:12, Helin Zhang: > Add a known issue to warn that PF reset event/request is not > handled by any VF drivers till 2.2, and which should be fixed > in the future. > > Signed-off-by: Helin Zhang Reported-by: David Marchand [...] > +* Some (possibly all) VF drivers (e.g. i40evf) do not handle any PF reset > + events/requests in VF driver, that means VF driver may not work after a > + PF reset in host side. The workaround is to avoid triggering any PF reset > + events/requests on host side, or wait future fixes. It is not a workaround to wait for a fix ;) Applied without last words, thanks