From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethdev: enhance api doc for getting supported packet types Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 16:18:36 +0200 Message-ID: <5113869.20L6IQKHmh@xps13> References: <1467362632-1533-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Olivier Matz , konstantin.ananyev@intel.com Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED0C2B91 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 16:18:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id v199so28590195wmv.0 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 07:18:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1467362632-1533-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-07-01 10:43, Olivier Matz: > As discussed in http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-June/042229.html, > clarify the behavior of rte_eth_dev_get_supported_ptypes(). > > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz Konstantin had already reviewed this text in the above thread. Applied, thanks Are we sure every drivers are satisfying this new constraint?