From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: fix missing NULL pointer checks
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 22:26:46 +0100
Message-ID: <5122600.hXUxZ4V3cS@xps13>
References: <1418895707-468-1-git-send-email-danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com>
 <20867625.qP6gkIlEQ3@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
To: Daniel Mrzyglod <danielx.t.mrzyglod-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20867625.qP6gkIlEQ3@xps13>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>

Ping. What next for this patch?

2014-12-18 22:05, Thomas Monjalon:
> 2014-12-18 09:41, Daniel Mrzyglod:
> > In test_sched, we are missing NULL pointer checks after calls to create the 
> > mempool and to allocate an mbuf. Add in these checks using VERIFY macros.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzyglod <danielx.t.mrzyglod-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> >  app/test/test_sched.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_sched.c b/app/test/test_sched.c
> > index c957d80..9b6e037 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_sched.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_sched.c
> > @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ test_sched(void)
> >  	int err;
> >  
> >  	mp = create_mempool();
> > +	VERIFY(mp != NULL,"Error create mempool\n");
> 
> A space is missing after the comma.
> Is "Error creating mempool" more correct?
> 
> >  	port_param.socket = 0;
> >  	port_param.rate = (uint64_t) 10000 * 1000 * 1000 / 8;
> > @@ -184,6 +185,7 @@ test_sched(void)
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> >  		in_mbufs[i] = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mp);
> > +		VERIFY(in_mbufs[i] != NULL, "Bad packet allocation");
> 
> An \n is missing.
> "Packet allocation failed" seems more appropriate.